In a recent opinion, a state supreme court reversed a district court’s decision granting summary judgment to a doctor involved in a medical malpractice lawsuit. The lawsuit stems from an incident in which a woman twisted her knee while at work. The procedural rules discussed in the case may be relevant to some New Mexico medical malpractice cases as well.
In 2007, the plaintiff went to an orthopedic surgeon, who performed a resection. At some point during the surgery, the doctor discovered that there was an additional tear, but he did not repair it. Approximately two months later, the doctor performed another surgery and drilled a hole through the bone. The doctor continued to monitor the woman and noted that she was doing “extremely well,” except one note that indicated some pain.
The patient filed a medical malpractice lawsuit and testified that she experienced an excruciating pain near the surgical site. However, she said she was not aware if it was related to the hole that was drilled because she had two different surgeries. The patient received a second opinion about the origin of her pain from a doctor who reviewed the records and stated that there may have been a problem with the first surgery. The patient also testified that this was the first time she realized that the first doctor could have botched the surgery.